Comments on: The Resolution of Film http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2009/11/the-resolution-of-film.html Photos, Reviews, Instruction Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:59:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dwight http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2009/11/the-resolution-of-film.html/comment-page-1#comment-1047 Dwight Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:59:10 +0000 http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/?p=622#comment-1047 You're right about this. I got serious about photography shortly after the OM-4 was introduced. I really liked that camera. It had just the controls I needed, laid out in a way that made them easy to use. It's almost sad to see such a camera selling for so little on e-bay... I'm convinced that a good lens is more important than the recording media. I've made good photos (and crumby ones) with film and with digital. I still use the OM-4 from time to time, but usually stick with digital so I don't have to scan all those negatives. I'm not the first person to wish for a "digital OM", but the manufactures seem to be obsessed with cramming more features into cameras. I'm new to your blog. I enjoy your photos. Your style and subject matter are different than my own. I enjoy seeing it done so well. You’re right about this. I got serious about photography shortly after the OM-4 was introduced. I really liked that camera. It had just the controls I needed, laid out in a way that made them easy to use. It’s almost sad to see such a camera selling for so little on e-bay…

I’m convinced that a good lens is more important than the recording media. I’ve made good photos (and crumby ones) with film and with digital. I still use the OM-4 from time to time, but usually stick with digital so I don’t have to scan all those negatives. I’m not the first person to wish for a “digital OM”, but the manufactures seem to be obsessed with cramming more features into cameras.

I’m new to your blog. I enjoy your photos. Your style and subject matter are different than my own. I enjoy seeing it done so well.

]]>